New hope for sex offender treatment

Sadly this article generalizes all sex crimes as defined by the state. Rapists (aggressive taking of sex from another individual) and child sexual abuse (molestation of children without consent, which is most if not all when it includes children prior to tweets/teen years) are sex crimes, whereas the state includes consensual sexual relationships between humans separated only by a numbered marker and even urination in public as sex crimes as well. So to assume that the article somehow proves that rapists and child molesters will not generally re-offend, e.g.., recidivism is incorrect and fallacious.

I stand by my approach in regards to these crimes and murder (consciously deciding to kill someone or engaging in the act that ends in death as a direct result of a conscious choice), this approach being the termination of said individuals without remorse or attempt at reintegration into society. This approach being in the hands of those who have been directly affected by the crimes themselves.

If the person reading this has a basic grasp on English I would suggest utilizing a dictionary as common definitions are assumed when I write.

Free the mind and the body will follow


About Jesse Mathewson

Jesse Mathewson is the author of the popular blog, and provides commentary to many varied places based on a background that includes education in criminal justice, history, religion and even insurgency tactics and tactical training. His current role in his community is as an organizer of sorts and a preacher of community solidarity and agorism. He also runs Liberty Practical Training, a self defense school specializing in the practical applications of defensive approaches versus the theoretical. As an agorist, voluntaryist and atheist his life is seen as crazy and wild by many, though once they get to know him most realize he is a bluntly honest individual who will give you the shirt off his back if he believes it is necessary to help you. Very simple, "That which is voluntary between all individuals involved is always right, if it is not voluntary, it is always wrong."
This entry was posted in Voluntaryism. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to New hope for sex offender treatment

  1. Nita Ostroff says:

    too many people today declared sex offenders for things that really should not be sex offenses and which essentially hurt no one ….urinating in public coming home from a bar, a 23 year old with a 16 year old girlfriend, etc. IMHO of course


Comments are closed.