Sadly this article generalizes all sex crimes as defined by the state. Rapists (aggressive taking of sex from another individual) and child sexual abuse (molestation of children without consent, which is most if not all when it includes children prior to tweets/teen years) are sex crimes, whereas the state includes consensual sexual relationships between humans separated only by a numbered marker and even urination in public as sex crimes as well. So to assume that the article somehow proves that rapists and child molesters will not generally re-offend, e.g.., recidivism is incorrect and fallacious.
I stand by my approach in regards to these crimes and murder (consciously deciding to kill someone or engaging in the act that ends in death as a direct result of a conscious choice), this approach being the termination of said individuals without remorse or attempt at reintegration into society. This approach being in the hands of those who have been directly affected by the crimes themselves.
If the person reading this has a basic grasp on English I would suggest utilizing a dictionary as common definitions are assumed when I write.
Free the mind and the body will follow