State rules in favor of state: Butch

Written by Butch

Today, U.S. District Judge William Pauley chose to ignore the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution in favor of a STAZI type of surveillance of the American people.  His ruling stated that the use of acquiring all the information is a blunt tool required to gain even minute information from potential terrorists. Well, a nuclear warhead is a blunt instrument that is very useful in eliminating terrorist hives.  Sure, a lot of innocent are harmed, but at least one can rationalize using his mindset.

This judge should be impeached for his shredding of the Constitution in favor of another step towards totalitarian style of control over the people.

There are only two probable reasons for his ruling. Neither is positive.
1) The NSA pulled his data and found that Judge Pauley has several skeletons in his closet that may range from bribery to child porn. ….Who knows?

2) That the Judge has never been a believer in the Constitution and has determined that he has a fiefdom in New York, therefore he is supportive of the destruction of the Constitution.

Regardless of what the reason is for his obvious disregard of the Constitution, it is a harsh slap in the face of the American public.

Advertisements

About Jesse Mathewson

Jesse Mathewson is the author of the popular blog, jessetalksback.com and provides commentary to many varied places based on a background that includes education in criminal justice, history, religion and even insurgency tactics and tactical training. His current role in his community is as an organizer of sorts and a preacher of community solidarity and agorism. He also runs Liberty Practical Training, a self defense school specializing in the practical applications of defensive approaches versus the theoretical. As an agorist, voluntaryist and atheist his life is seen as crazy and wild by many, though once they get to know him most realize he is a bluntly honest individual who will give you the shirt off his back if he believes it is necessary to help you. Very simple, "That which is voluntary between all individuals involved is always right, if it is not voluntary, it is always wrong."
This entry was posted in Voluntaryism and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to State rules in favor of state: Butch

  1. Well, from this point of view it is neither moral, nor immoral because if I have signed a contract with the state then right and wrong don’t count. What now matters is that I have signed. Now, contacts with the state are called Adhesion Contracts and are much different than contracts signed with people. The Adhesion Contract is a one sided deal, a take it or leave it kind of deal. People don’t negotiate with their insurance company for better terms. The Insurance company says this is the deal, if you don’t like it take a hike. And that is the same deal that people have gotten themselves into with the state.

    Like

  2. In summary, this is not tyranny but rather choice. Now, they don’t explain to you the law and explain this to anyone but why would a slave owner explain to the slave how to be free?

    Like

  3. It was settled earlier that the conversation on a cell phone is not private because the user has alienated him self from the voice packet sent to the tower. The tower is the third party to the conversation there for the expectation of privacy is not there. Land line communication does carry expectation of privacy. The revelance to this case? Contract law superceds rights. A man can contract himself into slavery and have in fact done so via the contracts they have unwittingly signed.

    Like

  4. Mike says:

    Reblogged this on This Got My Attention and commented:
    The “Ends Justify the Means” rationale is the foundation of every tyranny. This time they find a judge to help them carry out their abuses.

    Like

Comments are closed.